She proposes to amend the RICO laws to include child sexual abuse. She evidently thinks religion is a racket like the mob is. . . and she doesn't appear to limit this to a religion that believes in plural marriage. She proposes:
First, amend 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) to include the following bolded language:
It shall be unlawful for any person, or enterprise engaging in, promoting, or facilitating childhood sexual abuse or neglect, employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
Second, amend 18 U.S.C. 1961(1)(a), the definition of “Racketeering Activity,” to include the bolded language:
(1)“racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, engaging in, promoting or facilitating childhood sexual abuse or neglect, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year;
She also proposes to expand the injuries defined by RICO from only injury to business or property to add injury to the person, if a child sexual abuse victim. This would allow for triple damages in a civil lawsuit.
Now, I don't get it. How does plural marriage or a religious practice constitute a business operation? I mean, RICO must, by definition involve commerce. Well? (
Moving on. . .she wants the states to eliminate statutes of limitations on sexual abuse allegations. Given the history of sexual abuse allegations, false memories, and the child saver mentality to believe the child no matter what, this is a horrifying prospect for anyone would would be falsely accused by a bratty child seeking to get his or her own way or a vindictive ex seeking to eliminate all challenges to custody! Many states have long statutes of limitations already. This is a thoughtless, knee-jerk reaction based on emotions. Typical of the child saver.
Finally, she proposes something that actually makes sense, and I could get behind this one:
Revocation of tax-exempt status for organizations furthering child abuse or neglect. Tax-exempt status for a charitable organization under the Internal Revenue Code shall be revoked by the Internal Revenue Service from any organization if it is found by a court of law in a civil or criminal case that the organization:
(a) Fostered the abuse of children,
(b) Took steps to conceal the abuse of children,
(c) Failed to report knowledge of child abuse or neglect to the relevant law enforcement authorities.
Finally, federal agencies should not be permitted to do business with any organization that furthers or fosters child sex abuse or neglect.
Given the plethora of private charities so poorly and callously administering child welfare, foster care and adoptions, this could completely booger up the child welfare works by making foster care safer than the family home, and in the process, eliminating all inferior foster care.
The largest segment of our population who sexually abuses children is the foster care business. And foster care is a multi-billion dollar interstate commerce enterprise.
Sometimes it's the foster caregivers doing it, sometimes it's the foster care-giver's kids molesting the foster kids, sometimes it's another foster kid doing the molesting, and sometimes it's a friend of the foster care-givers. But most of it happens in foster care.
But wait. . .back to the proposed RICO provisions. . .perhaps these foster placement agencies, group homes and residential treatment centers COULD be held criminally or civilly liable under RICO? RICO is a darned hard case to make and most courts toss RICO claims. . . BUT. . .while the RICO might not fly for a religion, it might fly for these non-profits.